Hey dumbass, the left is an appropriations bill which is what congress is supposed
— Adam Kinzinger (Slava Ukraini) 🇺🇸🇺🇦🇮🇱 (@AdamKinzinger) December 21, 2024
To do, detail what it’s appropriating which takes a lot of pages.
The one on the right is a CR with NO transparency on what is being appropriated https://t.co/PUUf9f6mqX
In Loper Bright, the Supreme Court overturned Chevron deference. K&L Gates explains that Congress needs to make bills more detailed, not less:Not that anyone cares about logic but it really doesn’t make sense to hate “the administrative state” making rules in the absence of congressional specifics and *also* hate it when bills are long.
— Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) December 20, 2024
The Supreme Court’s new mandate for more specific authorizations of authority will place an imposing new requirement on Congress to draft its bills more precisely. Write the authorization too broadly and it may not pass judicial muster. Write it too narrowly, and Congress risks missing areas of interest where it would have wanted the agency to act. This dilemma may be particularly difficult in emerging areas like regulation of cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, where contours of the issues are yet to be fully understood.
